The effectiveness of test coverage criteria for relational database schema integrity constraints

McMinn, Phil and Wright, Chris J. and Kapfhammer, Gregory M.

Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 25:1, 2015

Abstract

Despite industry advice to the contrary, there has been little work that has sought to test that a relational database’s schema has correctly specified integrity constraints. These critically important constraints ensure the coherence of data in a database, defending it from manipulations that could violate requirements such as "usernames must be unique" or "the host name cannot be missing or unknown". This paper is the first to propose coverage criteria, derived from logic coverage criteria, that establish different levels of testing for the formulation of integrity constraints in a database schema. These range from simple criteria that mandate the testing of successful and unsuccessful INSERT statements into tables to more advanced criteria that test the formulation of complex integrity constraints such as multi-column PRIMARY KEYS and arbitrary CHECK constraints. Due to different vendor interpretations of the structured query language (SQL) specification with regard to how integrity constraints should actually function in practice, our criteria crucially account for the underlying semantics of the database management system (DBMS). After formally defining these coverage criteria and relating them in a subsumption hierarchy, we present two approaches to automatically generating tests that satisfy the criteria. We then describe the results of an empirical study that uses mutation analysis to investigate the fault-finding capability of data generated when our coverage criteria are applied to a wide variety of relational schemas hosted by three well-known and representative DBMSs — HyperSQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite. In addition to revealing the complementary fault-finding capabilities of the presented criteria, the results show that mutation scores range from as low as just 12% of mutants being killed with the simplest of criteria to 96% with the most advanced.

Resources

Paper

schemaanalyst/schemaanalyst

Reference

@article{McMinn2015,
  author = {McMinn, Phil and Wright, Chris J. and Kapfhammer, Gregory M.},
  title = {The effectiveness of test coverage criteria for relational
               database schema integrity constraints},
  journal = {Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology},
  volume = {25},
  number = {1},
  year = {2015},
  tool = {https://github.com/schemaanalyst/schemaanalyst}
}
Return to the List of Papers
Like my work? Support it!